Hardware | AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB review: plenty of performance with 16GB

[么 ANGRRY]

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB arrives as the far better and more attractive mainstream GPU option — the one the market has been waiting for. Nvidia still reigns as the performance champion at the top, but the further down the stack you go, the less attractive Team Green’s offerings become. Witness the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti 8GB, two GPUs that frequently become hamstrung by insufficient VRAM. How does AMD’s latest card stand up to the best graphics cards, and where does it sit in the pantheon of the GPU benchmarks? That’s what we’re here to find out.

We’re fleshing out the major offerings for the current generation of GPUs from all three vendors with today’s RX 9060 XT review. Along with AMD’s RDNA 4 GPUs, we’ve tested all the initial onslaught of Nvidia Blackwell GPUs, plus Intel’s two (for now) Arc Battlemage GPUs. That doesn’t mean there won’t be mid-cycle refresh GPUs like last generation's RTX 40-series Super cards, but those generally slot into the existing structure without shaking things up too much. If those cards do happen — and they probably will — they’re likely to arrive in early-to-mid 2026.

Many have noticed that our standalone RTX 5060 review didn’t happen, and there are good reasons for that. Jarred has left the building, and while he’s helped us put together this one final hurrah, timing and a lack of direct sampling from Nvidia delayed the testing of that card. So, today’s review marks a two-for-one special of sorts — three-for-one if you want to also count the lackluster RTX 5060 Ti 8GB, which we also had to purchase for testing.

AMD’s launch pricing for the RX 9060 XT officially sits at a base of $299 for the 8GB card, and $349 for the 16GB variant. The good thing about being a few days late to the launch party is that we can actually reflect on retail prices. Right now, the 8GB models are relatively available at $299. The 16GB cards are in much higher demand, and rightly so, with the lowest currently available prices starting at $389. These are still early prices, however, so it’s possible we’ll see the base 16GB prices eventually dip back to AMD’s recommended $349.

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB (16GB Black) at Amazon for US$379.99
Graphics Card

RX 9060 XT 16GB

RX 9060 XT 8GB

RTX 5060 Ti 16GB

RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

RTX 5060

Arc B580

Architecture

Navi 44

Navi 44

GB206

GB206

GB206

BMG-G21

Process Technology

TSMC N4P

TSMC N4P

TSMC 4N

TSMC 4N

TSMC 4N

TSMC N5

Transistors (Billion)

29.7

29.7

21.9

21.9

21.9

19.6

Die size (mm^2)

199

199

181

181

181

272

CUs / SMs / Xe-Cores

32

32

36

36

30

20

GPU Shaders (ALUs)

2048

2048

4608

4608

3840

2560

AI / Tensor Cores

64

64

144

144

120

160

Ray Tracing Cores

32

32

36

36

30

20

Boost Clock (MHz)

3130

3130

2572

2572

2497

2850

VRAM Speed (Gbps)

20

20

28

28

28

19

VRAM (GB)

16

8

16

8

8

12

VRAM Bus Width

128

128

128

128

128

192

Infinity / L2 Cache

32

32

32

32

24

18

Render Output Units

64

64

48

48

48

80

Texture Mapping Units

128

128

144

144

120

160

TFLOPS FP32 (Boost)

25.6

25.6

23.7

23.7

19.2

14.6

TFLOPS FP16 (FP4/INT4/FP8 TFLOPS)

205 (821)

205 (821)

190 (759)

190 (759)

153 (614)

117 (233)

Bandwidth (GB/s)

320

320

448

448

448

456

TBP/TGP (watts)

160

150

180

180

145

190

Launch Date

Jun 2025

Jun 2025

Apr 2025

Apr 2025

May 2025

Like Nvidia’s RTX 5060 Ti, AMD’s RX 9060 XT comes in both 8GB and 16GB variants, mostly with the same specifications. The 16GB card has a 10W higher base power rating, as well as double the VRAM. The added power means that the 16GB card should never be slower compared to the 8GB model (other than margin of error), and in more demanding games it could prove significantly faster.

What’s the direct competition for the RX 9060 XT? Is it Nvidia’s similarly priced (for the 9060 XT 8GB) RTX 5060, or is AMD going after the higher performance RTX 5060 Ti and undercutting Nvidia’s pricing by $80? The latter seems the more likely target, and we don’t have the 8GB AMD card for testing (yet), so we can’t make a direct comparison between the $299 parts.

In terms of raw specs, AMD offers slightly more FP32 compute than the RTX 5060 Ti — and slightly more AI compute as well, since RDNA 4 has added native INT4 support. That’s a bit apples and oranges, and Intel only has native FP16 or INT8 support, but we’ll see how things fare when we get to the benchmarks.

One area where Nvidia does hold a decided advantage is in raw memory bandwidth. The Blackwell architecture uses GDDR7 memory, clocked at 28 Gbps for the 5060-class GPUs. That’s 40% faster than the GDDR6 20 Gbps memory used by AMD RDNA 4 and Intel Battlemage GPUs. But raw bandwidth isn’t the only important factor; cache and caching algorithms also play a role, and potentially memory timing as well, so it’s possible AMD’s 9060 XT will be able to keep pace despite the raw bandwidth deficit. Again, we’ll see how things play out in the benchmarks.

Power differences have shrunk with this generation, as AMD and Nvidia are now basically using the same TSMC process node. Technically, AMD even has a slight node lead, since it’s using N4P while Nvidia uses the vanilla 4N (basically N4). Intel uses the slightly older N5 node for Battlemage. AMD specifies 160W for the base model 9060 XT 16GB, and 150W for the 8GB variant, compared to 180W for Nvidia’s competing RTX 5060 Ti, and 190W for Intel’s Arc B580.

https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/amd-radeon-rx-9060-xt-16gb-review